Feedback A TEEM 2019

A TEEM 2019 on-line feedback

Thank you for taking the time to complete this feedback form. Your feedback will be considered and recorded. The data will be used to provide anonymous feedback to speakers and in the process of selecting future speakers/topics. It will also be used to generate your CPD/CME certification e-mail in due course. This will be e-mailed to the address you provide below, but please allow a few days for processing.

Please take care with spelling accuracy for names, etc. Do not use 'all caps'!

* Indicates required field

Name *

First

Last

Select Grade *

If "other" grade selected, specify here: *

Work Location (Trust or city) *

Email (be precise - this is the address we will use) *

Please provide general comments and suggestions for topics/sessions for the future: *

CPD for sessions with no feedback (see below): *

You may record your feedback below, following these instructions:
- For each lecture you have attended, choose the best answer in each of the six drop-list boxes, using your mouse to click and select
- Skip the items relating to any lecture you did not attend
- To certify that you did attend a lecture/session for which you are not providing feedback below (e.g. if you delivered that session), use the text box immediately above to indicate which session and the reasons for not providing feedback (e.g. "this was my lecture")

Excluding the time it takes for you to reflect, it should take 4-5 minutes to complete the rest of this form.

Drop-list boxes which are still not completed have a line of dashes showing ("Click & select ------------------------------") and are thus easier to spot with a quick scan of the form before you submit.

1. Remember whose side you are on (Vivek Khashu)

a. Quality of lecture? *

d. Appropriate relevance? *

b. Quality of audiovisuals? *

e. More lectures on this/related topic? *

c. Appropriate academic level? *

f. More lectures by this speaker? *

2. Information sharing to tackle violence (Lola Abudu & Jonathan Peepall)

a. Quality of lecture? *

d. Appropriate relevance? *

b. Quality of audiovisuals? *

e. More lectures on this/related topic? *

c. Appropriate academic level? *

f. More lectures by this speaker? *

3. We need to talk about burnout (Bernie Garrihy)

a. Quality of lecture? *

d. Appropriate relevance? *

b. Quality of audiovisuals? *

e. More lectures on this/related topic? *

c. Appropriate academic level? *

f. More lectures by this speaker? *

4. Frequent attenders (Ruchi Joshi)

a. Quality of lecture? *

d. Appropriate relevance? *

b. Quality of audiovisuals? *

e. More lectures on this/related topic? *

c. Appropriate academic level? *

f. More lectures by this speaker? *

5. Trainee perspective on UHCW (Edward Lodge)

a. Quality of lecture? *

d. Appropriate relevance? *

b. Quality of audiovisuals? *

e. More lectures on this/related topic? *

c. Appropriate academic level? *

f. More lectures by this speaker? *

6. 20 years of Governance (Caroline Park)

a. Quality of lecture? *

d. Appropriate relevance? *

b. Quality of audiovisuals? *

e. More lectures on this/related topic? *

c. Appropriate academic level? *

f. More lectures by this speaker? *

7. What's not going on (Chris Moulton)

a. Quality of lecture? *

d. Appropriate relevance? *

b. Quality of audiovisuals? *

e. More lectures on this/related topic? *

c. Appropriate academic level? *

f. More lectures by this speaker? *

8. Learning from excellence (Adrian Plunkett)

a. Quality of lecture? *

d. Appropriate relevance? *

b. Quality of audiovisuals? *

e. More lectures on this/related topic? *

c. Appropriate academic level? *

f. More lectures by this speaker? *

9. Re-thinking patient safety (Suzette Woodward)

a. Quality of lecture? *

d. Appropriate relevance? *

b. Quality of audiovisuals? *

e. More lectures on this/related topic? *

c. Appropriate academic level? *

f. More lectures by this speaker? *

10. Ask the VP (Chris Moulton)

a. Quality of lecture? *

d. Appropriate relevance? *

b. Quality of audiovisuals? *

e. More lectures on this/related topic? *

c. Appropriate academic level? *

f. More lectures by this speaker? *

11. [Please ignore this item]

a. Quality of lecture? *

d. Appropriate relevance? *

b. Quality of audiovisuals? *

e. More lectures on this/related topic? *

c. Appropriate academic level? *

f. More lectures by this speaker? *

Considering this whole event, please reply to the following questions:

20. Your choice of "best lecture": *

21. [Please ignore this question] *

22. Rate the conference venue: *

About your own experience of the EMCEF concept...

23. [Please ignore this question] *

24. [Please ignore this question] *

25. Would you recommend A-TEEM to colleagues at your grade? *

Click to submit to EMCEF

A TEEM 2019 on-line feedback

© EMCEF 2021

UpDATED 5 MAY, 2021

A TEEM 2019 on-line feedback​

© EMCEF 2021

UpDATED 5 MAY, 2021

A TEEM 2019 on-line feedback