Feedback E40

EMCEF 40 / ATEEM 2020 on-line feedback

Thank you for taking the time to complete this feedback form. Your feedback will be considered and recorded. The data will be used to provide anonymous feedback to speakers and in the process of selecting future speakers/topics. It will also be used to generate your CPD/CME certification e-mail in due course. This will be e-mailed to the address you provide below, but please allow a few days for processing.

Please take care with spelling accuracy for names, etc. Do not use 'all caps'!

* Indicates required field

Name *

First

Last

Select Grade *

If "other" grade selected, specify here: *

Work Location (Trust or city) *

Email (be precise - this is the address we will use) *

You may include any general comments: *

CPD for sessions with no feedback (see below): *

You may record your feedback below, following these instructions:
- For each lecture you have attended, choose the best answer in each of the six drop-list boxes, using your mouse to click and select
- Skip the items relating to any lecture you did not attend
- To certify that you did attend a lecture/session for which you are not providing feedback below (e.g. if you delivered that session), use the text box immediately above to indicate which session and the reasons for not providing feedback (e.g. "this was my lecture")
- If your response to Q23 was that this is your first time at EMCEF, please do not answer Q24

There are 72 boxes below. Excluding the time it takes for you to reflect, it should take 4-5 minutes to complete the rest of this form.

This form must be completed in one sitting!

Drop-list boxes which are still not completed have a line of dashes showing ("Click & select ------------------------------") and are thus easier to spot with a quick scan of the form before you submit.

1. (Katie Wright)

a. Quality of lecture? *

d. Appropriate relevance? *

b. Quality of audiovisuals? *

e. More lectures on this/related topic? *

c. Appropriate academic level? *

f. More lectures by this speaker? *

2. Alcohol service at SWBH (Arlene Copland)

a. Quality of lecture? *

d. Appropriate relevance? *

b. Quality of audiovisuals? *

e. More lectures on this/related topic? *

c. Appropriate academic level? *

f. More lectures by this speaker? *

3. (Hena Syed-Sabir)

a. Quality of lecture? *

d. Appropriate relevance? *

b. Quality of audiovisuals? *

e. More lectures on this/related topic? *

c. Appropriate academic level? *

f. More lectures by this speaker? *

4. The view from the ambulance (Vivek Khashu)

a. Quality of lecture? *

d. Appropriate relevance? *

b. Quality of audiovisuals? *

e. More lectures on this/related topic? *

c. Appropriate academic level? *

f. More lectures by this speaker? *

5. A CEO's perspective (Richard Beeken)

a. Quality of lecture? *

d. Appropriate relevance? *

b. Quality of audiovisuals? *

e. More lectures on this/related topic? *

c. Appropriate academic level? *

f. More lectures by this speaker? *

6. RCEM President Elect (Adrian Boyle)

a. Quality of lecture? *

d. Appropriate relevance? *

b. Quality of audiovisuals? *

e. More lectures on this/related topic? *

c. Appropriate academic level? *

f. More lectures by this speaker? *

7. Regional sharing of best practice (Umesh Salanke)

a. Quality of lecture? *

d. Appropriate relevance? *

b. Quality of audiovisuals? *

e. More lectures on this/related topic? *

c. Appropriate academic level? *

f. More lectures by this speaker? *

8. Regional sharing of best practice (Ruchi Joshi)

a. Quality of lecture? *

d. Appropriate relevance? *

b. Quality of audiovisuals? *

e. More lectures on this/related topic? *

c. Appropriate academic level? *

f. More lectures by this speaker? *

9. Regional sharing of best practice (Barry Boland)

a. Quality of lecture? *

d. Appropriate relevance? *

b. Quality of audiovisuals? *

e. More lectures on this/related topic? *

c. Appropriate academic level? *

f. More lectures by this speaker? *

10. (Ash Singal)

a. Quality of lecture? *

d. Appropriate relevance? *

b. Quality of audiovisuals? *

e. More lectures on this/related topic? *

c. Appropriate academic level? *

f. More lectures by this speaker? *

11. [ D o N o t U s e ]

a. Quality of lecture? *

d. Appropriate relevance? *

b. Quality of audiovisuals? *

e. More lectures on this/related topic? *

c. Appropriate academic level? *

f. More lectures by this speaker? *

Considering this whole event, please reply to the following questions:

20. Your choice of "best lecture": *

21. Good value for money? *

22. Rate the conference venue: *

About your own experience of the EMCEF concept...

23. How often do you attend EMCEF? *

24. How did this EMCEF event measure up to our past standard? *

25. Would you recommend EMCEF to colleagues at your grade? *

Click to submit to EMCEF

EMCEF 40 / ATEEM 2020 on-line feedback

© EMCEF 2022

UpDATED 11 JAN, 2023

EMCEF 40 / ATEEM 2020 on-line feedback​

© EMCEF 2022

UpDATED 11 JAN, 2023

EMCEF 40 / ATEEM 2020 on-line feedback